Penerapan Metode SAW untuk Penentuan Pemenang Lomba Desain Grafis
Keywords:
Decision Support System, SAW, Graphic Design Competition Evaluation, Assessment Criteria, ObjectivityAbstract
The evaluation of graphic design competitions often faces challenges related to jury subjectivity, which can affect the final results and lead to dissatisfaction among participants. This study aims to apply the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method in the scoring system of graphic design competitions to achieve more objective and transparent assessments. The SAW method is used to evaluate participants based on four main criteria: aesthetics, originality, theme relevance, and technical quality. Each criterion is assigned a weight according to its level of importance, and preference values are calculated to determine the winner. The results of the study show that the application of the SAW method successfully reduces subjective bias and increases consistency in scoring. Participants with the highest preference values are selected as the winners, with the system facilitating a more objective evaluation process. This research also contributes to the development of more transparent assessment systems in various creative competitions. However, determining the weighting of criteria remains a challenge that requires further discussion between judges and organizers.
References
[1] B. Arifitama, “Decision Support System Scholarship Selection Using Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Method,” JISA(Jurnal Inform. dan Sains), vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 80–84, 2022, doi: 10.31326/jisa.v5i1.1279.
[2] Y. Musfawati, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Untuk Pemilihan Pemimpin Organisasi,” Simetris J. Tek. Mesin, Elektro dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 59, 2013.
[3] I. Juniarto and A. Widjaja, “Pemilihan Daerah Penerima Bantuan Logistik Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW),” J. Inform. Univ. Pamulang, vol. 5, no. 4, p. 640, 2021, doi: 10.32493/informatika.v5i4.8315.
[4] H. Al Jufri, “PERHITUNGAN MANUAL DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODA SAW (Simple Additive Weighting),” J. Ilm. Sist. Inf., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 59–68, 2022, doi: 10.46306/sm.v2i1.21.
[5] M. Sutoyo, “The Application of Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) Method to Detect Hard Disk Damage,” Indones. J. Inf. Technol., vol. 01, no. 02, pp. 30–36, 2018.
[6] M. Fahmi, Andayani, J. Sabtu, and Kusrini, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Untuk Menentukan Penerima Beasiswa Menggunakan Metode SAW,” METIK J., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 6–14, 2018, doi: 10.37600/tekinkom.v5i2.684.
[7] A. Syarif, Q. Aprilarita, M. Rizki, and F. R. Lumbanraja, “Implementasi Metode Simple Additive Weighting (Saw) Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Rumah Berbasis Android,” J. Tekno Kompak, vol. 14, no. 2, p. 102, 2020, doi: 10.33365/jtk.v14i2.796.
[8] F. Sembiring, M. T. Fauzi, S. Khalifah, A. K. Khotimah, and Y. Rubiati, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerima Bantuan Covid 19 menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) (Studi Kasus : Desa Sundawenang),” Explor. Sist. Inf. dan Telemat., vol. 11, no. 2, p. 97, 2020, doi: 10.36448/jsit.v11i2.1563.
[9] F. Febriyanto and I. Rusi, “Penerapan Metode Simple Additive Weighting Dalam Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Smartphones,” IJCIT (Indonesian J. Comput. Inf. Technol., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 67–74, 2020, doi: 10.31294/ijcit.v5i1.6674.
[10] G. Lumbantoruan, M. J. Purba, E. J. G. Harianja, R. Nainggolan, R. Perangin-Angin, and D. Manalu, “Determines the Weight Criteria of Simple Additive Weighting Method Using Certainty Factor,” 2019 Int. Conf. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol. ICoSNIKOM 2019, 2019, doi: 10.1109/ICoSNIKOM48755.2019.9111539.
[11] E. Sorongan, D. R. Sari, and P. Apriliza, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Gudang Menggunakan Metode Single Page Application Dan Simple Additive Weighting,” J. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 485–494, 2021, doi: 10.25126/jtiik.0813257.
[12] A. Pradipta, M. Amin, A. Sumpala, and M. Sutoyo, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Menentukan Lokasi Rumah Burung Walet (RBW) Menggunakan Metode AHP dan SAW,” J. Sains Dan Inform., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 157–166, 2019.